| Legal ForumsRegisterSign inBankruptcyBusinessCriminalEmploymentFamilyImmigrationReal EstateMore... | ChatUpcomingArchiveHelpAsk a LawyerToday's Q&AAsk a QuestionAsk a Lawyer ArchiveTopic Schedule |
| Legal Forms & DocumentsState Law and AgenciesU.S. ConstitutionFederal Courts & LawsU.S. Small Claims CourtFederal Government AgenciesLegal DictionaryFree Case Law Research |
In Ohio Bikers are reqired to wear helmets if they are under 18 or if they have been licensed for less than a year. However even bikers that are not required to wear helmets could have their money damages for injuries reduced if there is expert evidence admitted that had the motorcycle rider worn a helmet his injuries would have been lessened.
Ohio's highest court has not spoken on the issue. In order for the damages to be diminished the court would first have to determine that failure to wear a helmet could be considered contributory negligence. Then as stated above, an expert would have to render an opinion that had the helmet been worn the injureis would not have occured or been lessened .
Therefore a biker who sustains a head injury and is not wearing a helmet might be well advised advised to get a good motorcycle attorney who can challenge whether this evidence should be considered .
Disclaimer: The information provided on Lawyers.com is not legal advice, Lawyers.com is not a lawyer referral service, and no attorney-client or confidential relationship is or should be formed by use of the site. The attorney listings on Lawyers.com are paid attorney advertisements and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by Lawyers.com or any approved or authorized lawyer referral service. Your access to and use of this site is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

