In determining a property owner's "reasonableness," the law determines if there were
regular and thorough efforts to keep the property safe and clean. The following questions may
be asked to determine if a property or business owner is liable for the slip or trip and fall
injuries:
- If the trip or slip occurred due to a torn, broken, or bulging area of carpet,
floor, or ground, or wet or loose area; had the dangerous spot been there long enough so that the
owner should have known about it?
- Does the property owner have a regular procedure for
examining and cleaning or repairing the premises? If so, what is it and what proof does the
owner have of this regular maintenance?
- If you tripped over or slipped on an object someone
had placed or left on or in the floor or ground, was there a legitimate reason for the object to be
there?
- If there once had been a good reason for the object to be there but that reason no
longer exists, could the object have been removed, covered, or otherwise made safe?
- Was
there a safer place the object could have been located? Could it have been placed in a
safer manner, without much greater inconvenience or expense to the property owner or
operator?
- Could a simple barrier have been created or warning given to prevent people from
slipping or tripping?
- Did poor or broken lighting contribute to the accident?
If
the answer to one or more of these questions is yes, there may be a good claim for
compensation.