| Legal ForumsRegisterSign inBankruptcyBusinessCriminalEmploymentFamilyImmigrationReal EstateMore... | ChatUpcomingArchiveHelpAsk a LawyerMost Recent Q&AAsk a QuestionAsk a Lawyer Archive |

“What is my case worth?” Understandably, this is perhaps the most commonly asked question from clients. Speaking at a seminar several years ago, one venerated plaintiff’s lawyer, a practitioner for well over 50 years, remarked that he always answers, “The most I can get for you.” [Emphasis added.] That remark is memorable if only because it underscores how imprecise it is to price a case. (Others may question why he used “I” because it may overstate the role of the plaintiff’s lawyer which is, admittedly, important but not solely determinative.) A myriad of factors go into the calculation of a case’s value. We all know the two broad categories: liability and damages. It’s all the rest that makes the liability and/or damages better or worse: the plaintiff’s profile and ability to evoke sympathy, the existence of witnesses, the credibility of the parties/ witnesses, a good earnings history, good reports from respected treating physicians, residual impairment, amount of insurance coverage, etc.
These factors help the practitioner in making an informed assessment of a case’s value. I suppose a lawyer has a “gut” reaction to the value of a case. That is understandable but the “gut” reaction is only an initial hypothesis which should be subject to the many criteria outlined in the above.
