| Legal ForumsRegisterSign inBankruptcyBusinessCriminalEmploymentFamilyImmigrationReal EstateMore... | ChatUpcomingArchiveHelpAsk a LawyerMost Recent Q&AAsk a QuestionAsk a Lawyer Archive |
| State Law and AgenciesU.S. ConstitutionFederal Courts & LawsU.S. Small Claims CourtTraffic Violations in Your StateFederal Government AgenciesLegal DictionaryFree Case Law Research |

As a Boston personal injury
attorney, I certainly encounter accidents relating to bad weather. These can take the
nature of snow and ice, fall downs or auto accidents where the at-fault driver did not adjust for
inclement conditions.
A fall down injury occurring because of snow and ice is often
compensable. These usually serious injuries will result in a recovery if the condition causing
them came about because of an “unnatural accumulation” of ice and snow. In
contrast, a natural accumulation, the law states, is not something the landowner must remove or even
treat.
The above is a confusing concept. The guiding principle is that
bad weather is part and parcel of living in Massachusetts or New England. Consequently, the
person suing need show that a defect was present on the property, such as a hole for example.
That defect in combination with snow and ice will lead to the determination of an unnatural
accumulation and, therefore, increase the chances of a liability finding/settlement.
As for motor vehicle accidents in bad weather, your attorney should ask if the driver being sued
acted appropriately in the bad weather conditions. A defendant may say that skidding was
inevitable; I prefer to say that the driver failed to act reasonably given the prevailing weather
conditions. This is after all what negligence is all about.
View Robert Feinberg's Lawyers.com blog archive here.
